Advance Requests for MAiD in Dementia: Policy Implications from Survey of Canadian Public and MAiD Practitioners
Adrian C. Byram, PhD i
Ellen R. Wiebe, MD ii
Sabrina Tremblay-Huet, LLD iii
Peter B. Reiner, VMD, PhD iv
Canadian Health Policy, June 2021. ISSN 2562-9492 www.canadianhealthpolicy.com
ABSTRACT
Background: The Canadian public has repeatedly expressed its desire for advance requests for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) after dementia diagnosis, yet MAiD practitioners’ willingness to accede to such advance requests is unknown. This study explores the extent and nature of any gap between the public’s desire for, and practitioners’ willingness to provide MAiD, and identifies policies to ameliorate such a gap. Methods: Two complementary mixed-method surveys gathered data from convenience samples of 83 Canadian adults and 103 MAiD practitioners. The public survey asked participants which of five specific circumstances commonly encountered in dementia they would include in their advance requests. The practitioner survey queried the validation level participants would require before providing MAiD in each specific circumstance. Participants’ reasons were probed using thematic analysis of open-ended questions. Results: On average, 77% of public participants indicated they definitely or probably would include each of the five specific circumstances in their advance requests for MAiD. As validation level decreased from patient consent to patient assent, family assent, or advance request alone, the magnitude of the gap between the public’s desire and practitioners’ willingness increased. The practitioners’ qualitative data contained many practical insights from which emerged seven policy recommendations to ameliorate this gap and increase the likelihood of honouring patient requests. Interpretation: The study provides evidence of a gap between public desire for, and practitioner willingness to provide MAiD in dementia. The policy recommendations are relevant to consideration of legislation for advance requests for MAiD.
AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS
i Independent Scholar.
ii Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia.
iii Faculty of Law, University of Sherbrooke.
iv Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia.
SUBMISSION: May 26, 2021 | PUBLICATION: June 18, 2021
DISCLOSURES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. We thank the members of the public and MAiD practitioners who provided thoughtful insights to this study. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. PBR wishes to dedicate this paper to the memory of Gloria Olsen.
